Operation Gratitude Care Package Weekend!

Showing posts with label clueless. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clueless. Show all posts

Saturday, January 1, 2011

Nothing to Tell, But They Asked Me Anyway...

...or, "My big DADT adventure"...
"That man distinctly ogled my genitalia, captain.
File charges immediately."
Once I finished my active duty service, I was serving in the NY Army National Guard in the mid-1980's.  After a certain incident occurred (the term "organized a mutiny" seems so judgmental but it was in a damned good cause and I don't regret it), I was basically ruined as an enlisted man, so I was sent off to become an officer.  I finished OCS in the state program, and then I was sent off to Fort Benning for my infantry officer's basic course.


Now understand, I was a bit behind the curve here.  I was already pushing thirty (from one side or the other), and Guard units in the 80's were maybe not as physically rigorous in their training as they could be.  Plus, and I know this will be hard for anyone who knows me today to believe, I might not personally have been as entirely diligent as I could have been about my own fitness. Virtually all the other butterbars were in their early twenties, active duty.


So I loved IOBC but physically it was kicking my ass and taking my lunch money.


Anyway, field exercise.  Full kit. ALICE pack, LBE, M60, ammo, helmet, water, MOPP gear, etc. Sunny Ft. Benning, Georgia, always a summer pleasure. Size eight blood blisters inside size ten boots.  Much walking. Stopped walking. Dropped pack.  My lower back promptly began to offer opinions on my character and antecedents.  I grounded my 60, stuck both hands in my back and stretched... a position known to Mel Brooks fans as "the French Mistake" but with more snapping and popping.
Therapeutic but unmilitary
We get back in from the field and I get called in to our company commander's office, a Regular Army captain. Is there something I want to tell him?  Nervous incomprehension.  Remember, I was just out of OCS, where we were taught a pretty limited set of responses to superior officers, most of which consisted of 'Sir, yes, sir' and 'Sir, no sir,' or some pretty restricted elaborations thereon.


The captain starts talking very carefully. "One of your fellow officers reports that he saw you standing in an... unmilitary fashion.  With your hands on your... hips."


Now understand, we're right back out of the field.  I'm still wearing the same uniform I wore on the speed march back to main post.  My back is still hurting. Damn near as much as my vanity.


So I go off into a very polite, reasonable-toned, "by your leave, sir," kind of rant. I point out that I've already been running a Guard platoon, between my OCS and IOBC courses, and that I have a good working relationship with the sergeants, that I'm keeping up with the PT requirements of the course and active in the coursework, and that I take it poorly that one of my "fellow officers" is petty enough to be worrying about my posture. (Yeah, the butterbar was listing his military achievements. I know, I know...)


Anyway. Yes.  I was that clueless.


The captain stares at me for a moment, then tells me to watch my posture and dismisses me.


About ten years later, I'm walking down Ventura Boulevard and I literally stop in the middle of the sidewalk and yell "SONOFABITCH!"


Yes.  It took me that long.


Now, here's the thing I think about.  What if I hadn't been that clueless?  What if I had got what that captain, a good and diligent officer, was hinting at?  What if I had tried to defend myself against the insinuation I was gay?  How do you defend against that sort of suspicion?  Look around yourselves in your own workplaces and classrooms.  There are men and women you suspect are gay... no, check that, there are men and women you know are gay — without their volunteering the information and without your asking.  And let's face it, there is nothing they could do to convince you differently.  All I could have done was help cement the suspicion in my commanders' minds.  And how would that have affected my progress in IOBC, how might it have been reflected in my Officers' Efficiency Reports, documents that rival Mandarin court poetry in their arcana of phrasing and context?


Is that an unreasonable concern?  There was already some pending Patton among us who had time to go around ogling his fellow lieutenants' hips and running to the CO.


Which is why I was never that incensed about DADT.


Are there gays in the service?  Oh hell yes.  Always were, always will be.  That's why ALL the services had regulations against sodomy, for when they transgressed military law.  That's why we have the same regulations now for heterosexual misconduct. (No, we don't hang hetero offenders but then we don't hang gays anymore either)  They are necessary regulations for both both straight and gay military service.


Have gays in the military done our country damage?  Certainly I remember Bradley Manning, and the notorious Kim Philby for the Brits...  But I also remember Thomas Disch, the science fiction author, gay as a Paris spring (a six-foot-thirteen, 300-lb Paris spring)... who won the Silver Star as a BAR gunner in Korea.  And Aldrich Ames and the Walkers were straight as a plumb line.  Could gays be blackmailed with their gender preference. Sure.  As long as it matters to their superiors.  It's less of a lever if the CID response is "Yeah, so?"


So I'm not especially concerned about the disappearance of DADT.  The regulations and disciplinary mechanisms are in place... as are the less formal but no less real peer-enforced rules of the barracks.  A "predatory gay" in a forty-man platoon is a VERY short term problem, as should be a "predatory straight" in a mixed-gender unit.


Unless the civilian leadership of the military does something Carter-esquely stupid and begins making major changes in training, housing, etc., for gay personnel that would only highlight their presence, this is a "problem" the military is already set up to handle.  Fortunately, according to the service papers, the forces are NOT planning to make such foolish and aggravating changes.  The military will adapt to this better than the politicians and pundits will, and, I suspect, will continue to perform their mission with new gay enlistees as well as it performs them with the gays in the service now.


And future second lieutenants will have less to worry about their fellows eyeballing their asses...



"Eyes off the ass, buddy, or yer goin' on report!"

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Some People Are Not Paying Attention...

Meg "Zsa Zsa" Whitman is still asking me to follow her on Twitter.  What part of

DON'T BLAME ME I VOTED FOR POIZNER

does she not understand?!

Friday, May 28, 2010

Barack Obama -- Master of Disaster!

Carol of No Sheeples Here! has put together a terrific overview of the Great and Powerful Ob's hands-on leadership during the BP Gulf crisis.

Meanwhile, as Obama "confronts oil spill's spreading damage on the Gulf Coast", let's take a look at some of the other places he's confronted the oil spill's spreading damage during the crisis...
Obama narrowly escapes an oil slick on the White House floor...

Obama bravely avoids ordering oil and vinegar, settling instead for 
patriotic ranch dressing in a show of solidarity with Arizona...


Obama  defiantly wedges tar balls out of the hazard
on the 17th hole...

Obama gallantly rescues a stranded, naked hermit crab
that slipped out of its oily shell, after criticizing BP executives
for their delay in locating more photogenic wildlife...

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

MICHAEL STEELE IN "THE 1% SOLUTION"

"Michael Steele seen as leader of the GOP by just 1%" -- USA Today, 6/10/09


No, Mr. Steele, you really aren't.

Granted, it's USA Today, which is to newspapers what, well, the NYT is to newspapers. But still, has Michael Steele really made the slightest impression on this party, which is as fractious and argumentative as it has ever been since the days of Reagan?

Worse, he has done nothing to bring the differing factions together, or even shown much willingness to listen to the base on which factions to support. Instead, he has personally attacked those voices in the party who call for a new direction away from the ruinous accomodation and prodigal cohabitation that has cost us both houses and put the nation's economy on the lifesupport that Obama's healthcare reforms will make sure it can't afford.

And he has shown no indication that GOP business under his leadership will be anything other than business as usual, with our 'representatives' meekly kowtowing to their Democratic 'colleagues' solely in the hope that their personal rice bowls will go unspilled... until it is convenient for the Democrats.

He shows all the tactical savvy of a garment district schmatte-dealer who brings in mobsters to keep the workers from organizing, and then is surprised to find he's lost his business to his real enemies. He thinks that the Washington political herd is his party's hope for the future, not the Americans who vote for it, and donate to it.

He's wrong, and worse, he shows no sign he realizes he's wrong, or why.

It's time for the entrenched old-style Republicans to go, Steele and Cornyn and all their kind, if we are to make room to create a party that will save this country from the Democrats as they did in 1865.

As posted at Not One Red Cent

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Ya Can't Fix Stupid...



...but you can find out how high it went.

Do we really believe a mid-level WH flunky was the angel on the top of this decision tree? Let's say, as I for one am not willing to do, purely for the sake of argument, that the unabashed narcissist in the Oval Office wasn't aware of this 'photo op,' was never told of it by lackeys scurrying to curry favor. Do you think a low-level flunky like Caldera was the top of the decision loop? Possibly Barack Obama was not aware of activities involving his personal ride, his biggest piece of Presidential bling. But Rahm Emanuel? His chief of staff? He never got the memo?

This raises disturbing questions about the decision-making process inside the Obama White House. If something this dumb can be authorized without the knowledge or approval of the President or his highest subordinate, what else is going on in Barack Obama's own office that he has no notion about?

"Beyond fucking stupid," a NYC firefighter who left his lungs and a 20-year career in the dust of Ground Zero.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Obama Impressed by G19 Riots



Asks Brown, Sarkozy, Merkel: "Gee, why are they so mad at you guys?"

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Openest Administration EVAH! (2)



President Barack Hussein Obama, looking open

Obama Town Hall Questioners Planted Campaign Contributors

"Nothing suspicious there," according to the Washington Post.

Monday, March 2, 2009

Is it time for the mobs to storm the GOP Bastille?

Increasingly these days, it seems that the new motto of the Republican Party is becoming not "no," but "no, I don't want to hear it."



Those of you who have tried to contact a Congressman or Senator not your own may have noticed that e-mails at .gov are being set to filter out communications not from Congressmen's home districts or Senator's home states. They're voting on national issues but feel less inclined to hear from the national electorate.

The same thing is happening with their staffers when you try to reach them by phone.

I'm used to that sort of thing from Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank's crowd. This is new from the GOP and getting worse.

This is something I intend to keep in mind the next time I receive a solicitation e-mail from the RNCC.

Now we have Michael Steele taking a dump on Rush Limbaugh, even while admitting he has never listened to the show. Unelectable and stupid is no way to go through life, son. You would think his treatment during his senatorial run would have shown him the futility of reaching out to the opposition --




-- but it seems an inability to learn from experience is the hallmark of a Good Washington Republican.

Perhaps it is time to demand that the leadership of the RNC be selected by a radical new source. Voting Republicans. It could well be time to demand a national referendum on the GOP leadership. Such an election could be handled by mail-in ballots, and candidates for RNC leadership could state their case in venues made available by the likes of Fox News Sunday and even... dare I say it?... Rush Limbaugh's show.

List of Information, Implication and Insinuation

Three Beers Later!

    follow me on Twitter

    Blog Archive